Follow @USApostille
Our Videos |
August 29, 08
NEWS / CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF NEW YORK INVESTMENT FIRM INDICTED ON CHARGES OF SECURITIES FRAUD AND OBSTCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF NEW YORK INVESTMENT FIRM INDICTED ON CHARGES OF SECURITIES FRAUD AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE Defendant Altered Documents to Obstruct SEC’s Investigation GEORGE M. MOTZ, the president, CEO and Chairman of the Executive Committee of Melhado, Flynn & Associates (“MFA”), a broker-dealer and investment advisor registered with the former National Association of Securities Dealers, was arrested this morning and charged by indictment with securities fraud and altering documents to obstruct a United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) examination.1 The defendant is scheduled to be arraigned at 1:30 this afternoon before United States Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson, at the U.S. Courthouse, in Central Islip, New York. The case has been assigned to United States District Judge Arthur D. Spatt. The charges were announced by Benton J. Campbell, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, and Mark J. Mershon, Assistant Director-in-Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, New York Field Division. According to the indictment, from November 2000 to June 2005, MOTZ engaged in a fraudulent trade allocation scheme known as “cherry-picking.” Through this scheme, MOTZ generated virtually risk-free profits for MFA’s proprietary trading account and an advisory client hedge fund, Third Millennium Fund, L.P., at the expense of other MFA discretionary clients. Of the 204 trades MOTZ assigned to MFA’s proprietary trading account in the relevant time period, 202 were profitable. In the proprietary account alone, MOTZ generated approximately $1.4 million in profits as a result of the fraud scheme. As part of the charged scheme, MOTZ typically submitted stock “buy” orders to the 2 MFA trading desk in the morning, without indicating the accounts to which those purchases should be allocated, and did not provide the trading desk with allocation instructions until later in the day – often shortly before the close of the market. In effect, MOTZ purchased securities in the morning and then decided later in the day whether to sell the position and book the profit in either MFA’s proprietary trading account or the Third Millennium Fund, or to allocate the securities, often those that had depreciated in value during the day, to MFA’s discretionary client accounts. The indictment alleges that from November 2000 to September 2003, MFA’s proprietary trading account was the beneficiary of MOTZ’s scheme, and that from June 2003 to May 2005 the scheme favored the Third Millennium Fund. While MOTZ carried out his scheme, MFA’s discretionary account clients were falsely assured that, to the extent MFA engaged in proprietary trading on the firm’s behalf, the firm’s account would not be favored over the clients’ accounts. The indictment also alleges that, in the fall of 2003, MOTZ and others altered trade tickets associated with MFA’s proprietary trading account in order to make it appear as though the trades in question had been allocated earlier in the trading day than they actually were allocated, thereby concealing the scheme from SEC examiners who were conducting an on-site examination of MFA’s New York office. The SEC filed civil charges against MOTZ and MFA in February 2007. “The defendant’s scheme tilted the playing field to the advantage of favored investors at the expense of the investing public,” stated United States Attorney Campbell. “Such conduct undermines the public’s confidence in our securities markets and will be vigorously investigated and prosecuted.” FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge Mershon stated, “This case is another example of our commitment and determination to combat criminal activity in our nation’s financial markets.” The government’s criminal case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys James G. McGovern and Daniel A. Spector. The Defendant: Name: GEORGE M. MOTZ Age: 66 Source: http://newyork.fbi.gov/dojpressrel/pressrel08/securitiesfraud082808.pdf Tags: document, |
Do you need
We do Retrieval, Preparation and Legalization.
Power of attorney
Vital records
Birth certificate
Marriage Certificate
Single Status Affidavit
No Record of a Marriage
Certificate of No Marriage Record
Divorce Certificate
Divorce Decree
Death certificate
Criminal Record
Certificate of good conduct
Criminal Background Check
Foreign Driver License
Documents for transportation of the Deceased
Children's Travel Consent Letter
Evaluation of Foreign Education Credentials for US
Letter of Invitation for USA Visa
Documents for Avoiding Double Taxation
|
TestimonialsJohn BeacleayJust wanted to say thanks again for all your help Anton. I mean it's really amazing to me that yo... As a foreigner, I needed a certified translation, so I called the DOE to give me a list of the ce... |
FAQQ. Is there a hierarchical order in which service must be attempted on a foreign State under the Act?Read More » How long may an organization be authorized to issue health care worker certificates? Read More » Can I limit my notarial services to customers? To people I know personally? To business associates? Read More » Q. I filed my return on time, but I haven’t received my stimulus payment, even though the payment date listed for my Social Security number has passed. Why? Read More » |
Quick MenuNo Record of a Marriageapostille Monaco apostille Falkland Islands apostille Singapore apostille Kyrgyzstan apostille Suriname apostille El Salvador Birth certificate apostille Brunei apostille Dominican Republic apostille North Carolina apostille Saint Lucia apostille Alaska Letter of Invitation for USA Visa Business Licenses and Permits apostille Hungary |
NewsMarch 23, 26Kentucky Senate considers bill to grant automatic criminal record expungement Read More » March 11, 26 Kansas invalidates birth certificates and driver licenses of over 1,000 transgender individuals Read More » March 5, 26 Actor Martin Short’s daughter died of suicide – death certificate Read More » February 25, 26 Federal Appeals Court denies request to prevent IRS from sharing immigrant data with DHS Read More » |
