Our Videos

November 27, 08

NEWS / RBC Mortgage Company Pays U.S. More Than $10.71 Million to Settle Allegations Involving Federally In


WASHINGTON – RBC Mortgage Company (RBC) has agreed to pay the United States more than $10.71 million to resolve allegations arising under the False Claims Act concerning 219 federally insured loans for mortgages submitted to the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the Justice Department announced today. The government alleged that, between 2001 and 2005, RBC, a subsidiary of the Royal Bank of Canada, falsified documentation in support of loan applications, violated due diligence underwriting requirements and improperly submitted loans for endorsement by HUD that were not eligible for FHA insurance.

RBC, a publicly traded Canadian corporation, maintained offices located throughout the United States including Rockford, Ill. RBC was a pre-approved lender with "Direct Endorsement Authority" to originate and process FHA loans without waiting for prior review of the application by HUD. The FHA program and the direct endorsement process are designed to help low and moderate income families purchase homes by lowering some of the costs associated with mortgage loans.

As a pre-approved lender, RBC was responsible for conducting due diligence in underwriting the loans by verifying each borrower’s qualifications. The mortgage firm also was obligated to meet other requirements established by regulations or HUD program guidance. RBC has not originated a mortgage loan since September 2005.

The settlement reached between RBC and the United States resolves these allegations. In addition to its agreement to pay more than $10.71 million, RBC has also agreed to pay $264,000 to resolve administrative claims with respect to 39 federally insured loans.

This settlement was reached through the collaborative efforts of the U.S. Attorney’s office for Northern District of Illinois, the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Office of Inspector General and the Justice Department’s Civil Division.

http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2008/November/08-civ-1051.html

Tags: corporation, document,
 




Testimonials

John Beacleay

Just wanted to say thanks again for all your help Anton. I mean it's really amazing to me that yo...
Read More »
Niranjan Sujay
I recently used LOGOS INTERNATIONAL for the translation of my bachelor’s certificate, and I couldn’t...
Read More »
Katia Nagata

As a foreigner, I needed a certified translation, so I called the DOE to give me a list of the ce...
Read More »
AnnaMaria Realbuto
Thank you for all your assistance and efficiency...
Read More »




FAQ

You say I have to be an Arizona resident. Does that mean I have to be a citizen?

Read More »
WHAT IS THE LEGAL AUTHORITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED SERVICES TO PERFORM NOTARIAL ACTS ABROAD?
Read More »
So a sworn translation makes the original document valid in Brazil?

Read More »
Sealing the Juvenile Record. Whay is it?
Read More »






News

September 16, 25
Wisconsin bill may allow adoptees to access original birth certificates
Read More »
September 8, 25
Amended death certificate of MA State Police Academy recruit reveals he died from head injury
Read More »
September 5, 25
78-year-old Florida woman finally gets birth certificate after lifelong wait
Read More »
September 3, 25
US Congress considers legislation to expedite VA death certificates
Read More »