Follow @USApostille
Our Videos |
September 4, 09
NEWS / Department of Justice Will Not Challenge Hospitals Joint Purchasing AgreementProposal Could Result in Increased Hospital Services and Lower Costs WASHINGTON —The Department of Justice announced today that it will not challenge a proposal by Memorial Health Inc. (Memorial), and St. Joseph’s/Candler Health System (St. Joseph’s/Candler) to enter an exclusive joint purchasing agreement with respect to the purchase of certain medical and surgical supplies. The Department said that the proposed joint purchasing agreement may yield volume discounts and reduced transaction costs for the hospitals and ultimately could result in lower costs and increased hospital services for consumers. Under the proposed agreement, Memorial and St. Joseph’s/Candler would jointly evaluate medical and surgical products, designate suppliers and negotiate prices and other terms with them. Memorial and St. Joseph’s/Candler are 501(c)(3) non-profit organizations that own acute tertiary care hospitals in Savannah, Ga., that serve Southeast Georgia and the low-country area of South Carolina. Memorial owns and operates the Memorial Health University Medical Center. St. Joseph’s/Candler owns and operates St. Joseph’s Hospital and Candler Hospital. The Department determined that the proposal meets the requirements of the antitrust safety zone set forth in Statement 7 of the Department’s and Federal Trade Commission’s Statements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in Health Care. The safety zone requires that the cost of all products purchased through the joint purchasing agreement account for less than 20 percent of the total revenue of all products and services sold by each participant in the agreement. It also requires that products purchased through the joint purchasing agreement from a given supplier account for less than 35 percent of that suppliers’ sale of those products in the relevant market. Memorial and St. Joseph’s/Candler represented that they will abide by these limitations. Under the Department’s business review procedure, an organization may submit a proposed action to the Antitrust Division and receive a statement as to whether the Division currently intends to challenge the action under the antitrust laws. http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2009/September/09-at-930.html |
Do you need
We do Retrieval, Preparation and Legalization.
Power of attorney
Vital records
Birth certificate
Marriage Certificate
Single Status Affidavit
No Record of a Marriage
Certificate of No Marriage Record
Divorce Certificate
Divorce Decree
Death certificate
Criminal Record
Certificate of good conduct
Criminal Background Check
Foreign Driver License
Documents for transportation of the Deceased
Children's Travel Consent Letter
Evaluation of Foreign Education Credentials for US
Letter of Invitation for USA Visa
Documents for Avoiding Double Taxation
|
TestimonialsJohn BeacleayJust wanted to say thanks again for all your help Anton. I mean it's really amazing to me that yo... As a foreigner, I needed a certified translation, so I called the DOE to give me a list of the ce... |
FAQWhy dont fuel prices change as quickly as crude oil prices?Read More » Can a student with a dual major qualify for the STEM OPT extension based on one of the degree programs? Read More » What if My Case is in Process in a Convention Country before April 1, 2008? Read More » What form of ceremony is necessary? Read More » |
Quick Menuapostille Malawiapostille Macedonia apostille Switzerland apostille Grenada apostille Chile apostille Dominica apostille Colorado apostille Bermuda apostille Germany apostille Brunei apostille Egypt apostille Bahamas, The apostille Saudi Arabia apostille Haiti Certificate of Goodstanding apostille Portugal |
NewsJanuary 23, 26Israeli woman issued death certificate despite being alive Read More » January 21, 26 Maryland woman detained by ICE despite having US birth certificate Read More » January 16, 26 WV bill to lock sex designation on birth certificates Read More » January 14, 26 Tennessee family obtains death certificate for relative buried under incorrect name Read More » |
